6 Conclusion
The CMA CGM Libra judgment serves as a landmark case in maritime law, providing critical insights into the UK Supreme Court's interpretation of seaworthiness and its interplay with the nautical fault exemption under the Hague Rules. The judgement sheds light on the difficulty that arises when a nautical fault potentially renders a vessel unseaworthy. Importantly, the judgement confirmed that in the event of initial unseaworthiness due to an error in navigation, owners cannot avail of the nautical fault exemption. As has been explored throughout this thesis, it might be argued that the solution adopted in some respects is not sufficiently nuanced to appreciate the underlying rationales of the Hague Rules. Nevertheless, if anything, the judgement demonstrates that the doctrine of seaworthiness is very much relevant in contemporary maritime law, and that its relative nature allows it to continue to develop with time. As the maritime industry evolves, the development of the seaworthiness doctrine will undoubtedly remain a pivotal area to watch.